A Royal Salute to the Commonwealth

A royal portray to the race The member A royal salute to the community is written by Peter Osbourne, a British diary keeper and a political commentator. It reflects on the role of Commonwealth as universe a better appliccapable organisation for England than NATO and the European Union in this modern and evolution world, which promotes internationality and independence rather than superiority of oneness dominating coun analyse. Peter Osbournes views Commonwealth as an organisation, which has been underestimated for its possibilities oer the years.This is reflected from hobby adduce For many years it has been automatic in progressive circles to sneer at the Commonwealth as a meaningless relic of our imperial past. personal credit melody 20 summon 6. He holds the tactual sensation that New cranchs visions have been cloud-covered by their fascination of the coupled States and the European Union. His disapproval of Gordon Brown and Tony Blairs opinion is clearly presented in following quote ()it is Tony Blair and Gordon Browns poodle-like relationship with the fall in States, and the former slavish worship of the European Union, that now looks bulge out of date( ) line 28-30 page 7.From the quote above he presents the leader figures of the Labour party as being very unprofessional. Also he emphasizes that Commonwealth has a better applicatory stand than organisations such as NATO and the European Union by contrasting the advantages of Commonwealth with the flaws of NATO and EU. On a practical base Commonwealth is cheaper to run, whereas the cost of membership in EU is uncomparably high. Anformer(a) positive factor about Commonwealth is that about two billion people, to a greater extent than half of these being under the age of 25, lively in Commonwealth countries.This too allows a great diversity to be represented, now that the Commonwealth countries are to be found in any continent of the world. Although Peter Osbourne does recognize that Commonwealths administration is not as decently as the European Union, he is able to argue why this also could be an advantageous factor in the present world. Subjectively, he highlights the gloomy going tendency of the world being organized and ruled by one or two dominating super force-outs. Here he refers to the United States and the European Union.He believes that a modern stand of world organisation implies more equality and independence divided internationally, and thinks that having an alfa-country to be in charge is an out-dated coordinate to work after. Peter Osbourne also writes about which ways the Commonwealth acts in contrast to the neo-Conservatives. They both work to enlarge the signifi merchantmance of values such as democracy and humanity in the society, but Osbourne believes that they tackle the procession of the values differently. It is interesting to look at the words, he uses in the following quote.It tells a lot about how he tactual sensations that Common wealth stands out in a positive way But unlike the neo-Conservatives, it (Commonwealth, edited) does not try to promote these values through invasion. It uses fluid diplomacy and gentle pressure. line 46-47 page 7. There is no doubt that throughout the entire article Peter Osbourne presents Commonwealth subjectively for its advantage. The quote above in item shows, how he uses emotional words such as gentle and quiet to convince the reader of the numerous expediencys of Commonwealth.To describe the political leaders of Britain over the past decades he uses the words hostile and blind (see line 76 page 8). He criticizes them for leading Britain in the wrong direction by accepting the membership of the European Union. He feels that this has been a loss for England, because it opposes the acknowledgment of the great values of what Commonwealth implies. Another way he is able to promote Commonwealth is to put down other organisations similar to it. This makes Commonwealth stand out as a superior alternative to the other organizations.To begin with Peter Osbourne wants to touch the reader by presenting the scene when the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge chit-chat Canada in order to participate in Canadas National fight annals. This extract also shows his subjective use of words to advertise for the benefit of Commonwealth a visit to Canadas National War Memorial was a poignant reminder that Canadian troops had served alongside the British in the two great world wars of the last century. line 4-6 page 6.It can be interpreted as if Peter Osbourne wants the reader to feel that the Royal family, the representing faces of Commonwealth, wants to show their appreciation and acknowledgement for Canadas help in the wars. This gives the reader an impression of the Royal family for being respectful, down to earth and humane. The only(prenominal) concern Peter Osbourne has about Commonwealth is what its future would hold when the queen is no more. He hopes that the Duke and Duchess allow walk in the Queens footsteps, as she traditionally is the face outwardly.She symbolizes Commonwealths unity between the former countries, which used to be under the British Empire. At this point Peter Osbourne reflects on developing the Commonwealth organisation, so the headquarter no longer is bound to being establish in London. Apart from practical reasons, Peter Osbourne also writes about how this will eliminate the possibility of accusations of Britain trying to relive their imperious role, they had earlier. Osbourne suggests India as the new-made base because of its endless opportunities and great potential.Peter Osbourne sees The United States as Englands enemy, which can be interpreted from following quote They are guaranteed a ready reception, but for the wrong reasons. They will be feted as celebrities, not welcomed as members of a family of nations with which we have common values) line 96-98 page 8. There is no doubt, that from Peter Osbournes perspe ctive a bright future for England would be found on a radical promotion of Commonwealth, a progress of its power and last but not least an out phasing of the influence of the United States and the European Union.